The narrative in this post reflects an outdated political mindset, one that underestimates both PAS and, more importantly, the maturity of today’s voters.
Malaysians are no longer passive consumers of political propaganda. Voters today investigate truth independently, compare records, assess credibility, and interrogate facts. Fear-based narratives and speculative accusations no longer carry the weight they once did, especially when they are unsupported by evidence.
The claim that PAS is only restrained by coalitions ignores the most fundamental source of its accountability: PAS is governed by a constitution rooted in the Quran, embedding moral, ethical, and spiritual responsibility into leadership. PAS leaders are not accountable only to voters or political partners, but to a higher moral standard, answerable to God. This creates restraint, discipline, and self-regulation that transcends political convenience.
The slogan “PAS for All” is not rhetoric. It is inspired by Rahmatan Lil ‘Alamin – the principle of mercy, justice, and benevolence for all of humanity. Governance guided by this principle is not about exclusion or domination, but about fairness, compassion, and responsibility across communities.
Empowering one religion within a constitutional framework does not equate to extremism. Malaysia’s Constitution recognises Islam as the religion of the Federation while guaranteeing freedom of religion, culture, and rights for all citizens. Upholding this constitutional balance is governance, not radicalism.
Equally overlooked is PAS’s longstanding record of integrity. To date, PAS remains widely recognised as corruption-free in governance. Where misconduct arises, PAS has consistently taken firm internal action against members who deviate from ethical or legal standards. Accountability within PAS is not selective; it is enforced.
Moreover, the role of Dewan Himpunan Pendukung PAS (DHPP) has been deliberately institutionalised. DHPP exists to:
- Consult PAS leadership on non-Muslim rights within the Federal Constitution
- Address policy concerns affecting minority communities
- Promote coexistence and mutual respect
- Contribute towards a united, fair, and inclusive society
This consultative mechanism has always existed – whether PAS was in government, opposition, or coalition, and it reflects structural commitment, not political optics.
The suggestion that PAS, if governing independently, would abandon restraint, ignore constitutional limits, or marginalise communities is not supported by history, governance records, or institutional reality. It is a speculative fear narrative that no longer aligns with modern political awareness.
Democracy must be anchored in evidence, integrity, and lived experience, not outdated assumptions. PAS should be judged by its principles, track record, and governance discipline, not by recycled narratives of fear.
Dr Balachandran Gopal Krishnan
Ketua Penerangan DHPP Pusat